<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terry Richardson Update: Condé Nast CEO Responds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/</link>
	<description>And I'm getting madder.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:36:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ethical Style &#187; Vogue Rehires Photographer Accused of Harassing Models</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-97653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethical Style &#187; Vogue Rehires Photographer Accused of Harassing Models</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-97653</guid>
		<description>[...] top brass at Condé Nast knew about the allegations; CEO Charles Townsend reportedly said in March he was &#8220;appalled&#8221; at the evidence against Richardson, yet he was hired for the June issue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] top brass at Condé Nast knew about the allegations; CEO Charles Townsend reportedly said in March he was &#8220;appalled&#8221; at the evidence against Richardson, yet he was hired for the June issue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-78025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-78025</guid>
		<description>Go to Santa Fe for two frigging nights and look what I miss!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to Santa Fe for two frigging nights and look what I miss!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moda</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77712</link>
		<dc:creator>Moda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77712</guid>
		<description>Sent my email off to Chuck. Terry Richardson is repulsive excuse for a human being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sent my email off to Chuck. Terry Richardson is repulsive excuse for a human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dru</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77653</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77653</guid>
		<description>Here is the response I received :
________________
Dear Ms. _____ (my surname)
 I am not personally familiar with Mr. Richardson. I know nothing of what you refer to with regard to his behavior, but if it is factual, I do not condone such behavior.  Thank you for sharing your concerns with me. Respectfully,  C. Townsend
________________

I hope this does not get sidelined and glossed over like every other uncomfortable issue in fashion. And I&#039;m all on board with the &quot;contact the advertisers&quot; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the response I received :<br />
________________<br />
Dear Ms. _____ (my surname)<br />
 I am not personally familiar with Mr. Richardson. I know nothing of what you refer to with regard to his behavior, but if it is factual, I do not condone such behavior.  Thank you for sharing your concerns with me. Respectfully,  C. Townsend<br />
________________</p>
<p>I hope this does not get sidelined and glossed over like every other uncomfortable issue in fashion. And I&#8217;m all on board with the &#8220;contact the advertisers&#8221; too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iheartfashion</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77633</link>
		<dc:creator>Iheartfashion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77633</guid>
		<description>Excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boops</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77621</link>
		<dc:creator>boops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77621</guid>
		<description>Thought: if you feel like the fashion people won&#039;t respond, I wonder how they would feel about a letter writing campaign to their advertisers? I feel a little &quot;Tipper Gore&quot; about this but I hate sleaze buckets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought: if you feel like the fashion people won&#8217;t respond, I wonder how they would feel about a letter writing campaign to their advertisers? I feel a little &#8220;Tipper Gore&#8221; about this but I hate sleaze buckets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XuXu</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77588</link>
		<dc:creator>XuXu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77588</guid>
		<description>This is exactly why &quot;Cunt of the Week&quot; excels!!!

We should slam the designated with one day -(random to them)
of email!  Or, in this case, those that employ them.

So Proud Of The Wolf and The Andrea!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly why &#8220;Cunt of the Week&#8221; excels!!!</p>
<p>We should slam the designated with one day -(random to them)<br />
of email!  Or, in this case, those that employ them.</p>
<p>So Proud Of The Wolf and The Andrea!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hammie</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77578</link>
		<dc:creator>hammie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77578</guid>
		<description>The power of the Wolf xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The power of the Wolf xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella Mayfair</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77571</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella Mayfair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77571</guid>
		<description>goooood!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goooood!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.godammit.com/2010/03/22/terry-richardson-story-conde-nast-ceo-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-77567</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godammit.com/?p=4442#comment-77567</guid>
		<description>Make Do - Yep, but we will follow up with Conde Nast. They can&#039;t just deny responsibility. They&#039;ll have to at least take a stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make Do &#8211; Yep, but we will follow up with Conde Nast. They can&#8217;t just deny responsibility. They&#8217;ll have to at least take a stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

