What the Hell?
What’s wrong with this picture?
Nothing, until you find out it’s a one-piece “romper.”
Isn’t that just inexplicably horrible?!
I’m not sure why it’s so horrible, but the first thing that comes to mind for some reason is the problem of getting undressed with a lover. The shock, the confusion….IT’S ONE PIECE! Eooowwwww.
And you can’t even pull up the saggy jeans with a belt. It just creeps me out.
If you’re creeped out too, can you explain why?
Tags: awful clothes, jeans
August 11th, 2010 at 9:38 pm
I feel like fashion has reached a new low here. If you can’t master the shirt-tucked-in-jeans look on your own, there is no hope for you.
August 11th, 2010 at 9:46 pm
This *is* creepy – what happens when you need to visit the bathroom?
Who are these people that sat around a table and said “Right, what we need here is something new and inventive for this season. . .”
“what about a jeans/button-up-shirt romper suit”. ..
“yes, that’s genius” .. ..
Yuck.
August 11th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
I’m not really creeped out, but I’m not a big fan of optical illusion clothing. I don’t like sweaters with collars and cuffs sewn in to make it look like you are wearing a shirt and especially those dresses that are meant to look like a skirt and a shirt. It’s like a dickie, but worse.
August 11th, 2010 at 10:03 pm
Daphne Guiness would just love this. There’s no point to this outfit either.
ElenaR – I bought one of those sweater/shirt thingies a couple of years ago. Wore it once and couldn’t figure out how to wash it … it would need ironing. Pain in the arse (as we Aussies say) so I gave it to the Op Shop.
Not my style at all.
August 11th, 2010 at 10:08 pm
YUCK!! Make it go away!! Besides anything else, she looks hideous, can she please pull up the saggy arse on her jeans. Don’t think the issue of getting undressed in front of a lover would be a problem, no man would touch you with a ten foot pole in that number.
August 11th, 2010 at 10:10 pm
Does her arse look big in that??
August 11th, 2010 at 10:23 pm
Lucy – Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
August 11th, 2010 at 10:27 pm
What…the fuck? How does anyone rationalize buying this?
“What I really want is to sew my shirt and jeans together so that it is extra annoying to undress myself or go to the bathroom! The best part is that it will look exactly the same as a normal clothing – tricking people is SO fun!”
Clearly I don’t get it.
August 11th, 2010 at 10:37 pm
I think we all need cheering up.
Bring back David Duff in his underwear!!
August 11th, 2010 at 11:02 pm
I’m not creeped out. I think it’s a good idea.
But my question is…what’s a lover? I get undressed and get into my PJs in front of the refrigerator when I’m trying to multi-task by getting a quick snack while getting ready for Prime Time TV on the couch. I get undressed in complete darkness when I’m trying to pretend that reality doesn’t apply to me. I get undressed in front of a mirror if I’m feeling masochistic. But I haven’t got undressed in front of a lover. That’s a new one for me. Getting undressed in front of an empty extra-large bottle of wine, yes. In front of a lover, no.
August 11th, 2010 at 11:15 pm
Truly uncalled for. It just seems so insincere and fraudulent. How can you trust anyone wearing this? It’s like they’re trying to pull a fast one on you.
August 11th, 2010 at 11:31 pm
For the time poor dag.
August 12th, 2010 at 12:23 am
It’s like baby clothes for grown ups. The saggy pants have that whole ’space for your nappy’ thing going on.
August 12th, 2010 at 12:53 am
the more i read your blog the more mad i think the whole world is
August 12th, 2010 at 1:31 am
manrepeller!
August 12th, 2010 at 1:35 am
Going to the bathroom in this one would be a nightmare. You’re right… from the front, it looks… meh. From the back, it is a diaper. For the most part, women never want to elongate their torsos and shorten their legs, so I can’t see this garment having much appeal.
August 12th, 2010 at 1:42 am
It’s just taking one of the laziest, simplest looks of the summer (double denim) and making it stupidly complicated. It mainly weirds me out because until you explained it was an all-in-one I was thinking I would wear something like that tomorrow…
August 12th, 2010 at 2:12 am
This pains me. What kind of an imbecile needs their shirt pre-tucked into pants? It causes more problems than it solves! Fuck!
August 12th, 2010 at 2:39 am
I think it’s so creepy because this apparently normal shirt-and-jeans outfit is in fact merely a facade, concealing the unspeakable horror that lies beneath – the one-piece ‘romper’…
(That last part is said in a horrified whisper, like in ‘Heart of Darkness’ when Kurtz says ‘the horror!’)
It’s a romper in sheep’s clothing, if you will.
August 12th, 2010 at 2:47 am
I’m with ElenaR, ready made dressing clothes are my personal dislike. It is ridiculous not to be able to put garments together. I think babies often have the denim jean and shirt combo for their romper suits. ‘Bout sums it up, wear with nappy.
August 12th, 2010 at 3:04 am
Andra – Daphne wouldn’t be seen dead in this! She is anti-denim entirely!
All I can think is what a waste of 2 perfectly useful basics…
August 12th, 2010 at 3:18 am
On the other hand, it’s a more fashionable version of a coverall? I’m just trying to find the silver lining here.
August 12th, 2010 at 3:20 am
At least you don’t have to worry about your butt crack showing.
August 12th, 2010 at 3:21 am
ok, can you imagine taking this off in front of a guy???
men are the biggest fashion bullshit detectors and I can imagine getting a lot of shit for this. Really, you can’t master the shirt and jeans combo? it’s like oshkosh for grownups.
August 12th, 2010 at 3:36 am
Taylor is right – she has short legs, loong torso and droopy ass in this truly unflattering outfit. Why the rolled cuffs – to shorten the legs even more? Who’s the creator of this hideous crap?
August 12th, 2010 at 5:17 am
This is really weird. For one, the main reason I buy jeans is because you can wear them with different tops. How fucking dull to be stuck with the same boring-ass shirt every time you put the jeans on.
For two, is it just me or is the waist way too low? Almost around her ass? Looks like without the shirt tucked in she’d be rocking this look:
http://www.orble.com/images/zac-efron-showing-his-boxers1.jpg
which is perhaps why the two items are sewn together in the first place? I hope not. It’s a sad day when you’re too inept to keep your own pants up and need a tailor to do it for you.
August 12th, 2010 at 5:18 am
Sadness. I liked the outfit until I found that out. I dunno. Maybe I just have an issue with rompers on people over the age of five. Like footy-pajamas, you just outgrow them at some point. It also has this “you just HAD to wear pants that day but you couldn’t bear to put on two separate pieces of clothing?” vibe. Why not just wear the jeans and the shirt?
Then I have the nagging feeling that this outfit wouldn’t work outside the carefully positioned world of photos. The clothes wouldn’t move with the body in the casual, slouchy-but-confident way that makes an outfit like that so comfortable and pleasing to the eye. They’d move like a romper. Ew.
August 12th, 2010 at 5:26 am
Agree with everyone. Aja is right. IF you cant fucking tuck ur shirt into your laziest jeans properly, u have reached new lows. Also, the bathroom thing is really fucking nuts. Sometimes I wear rompers and when i find myself in public bathrooms with my boobies hanging out, i think – wtf am I doing?
August 12th, 2010 at 6:06 am
jesus christ, are we that lazy that we can’t tuck something into a pair of jeans? I shudder to think about going to the bathroom in a public place in that thing..
August 12th, 2010 at 6:32 am
This was designed by somebody who hates women.
August 12th, 2010 at 6:52 am
The back view makes my head spin. I think the awkward proportions are what make it so bad.
August 12th, 2010 at 7:25 am
Junya Watanabe did something like this for men–he printed the image of Levi’s (pockets and all) on a pair of blank pants. At first, I thought they were creepy and wrong, but soon I was wanting a pair and trying to figure out how I could hide a $900 charge from Barney’s from the Good Ed.
Who makes this thing for women? I kind of like it.
August 12th, 2010 at 7:28 am
Yay! The ugliness of baggy separates PLUS the inconvenience of a one-piece! Just what I’ve always wanted.
August 12th, 2010 at 8:22 am
oh my god. it’s like a second skin of hideousness. why not just get an all-over-body tattoo of jeans/gross early 90s chambray shirt and be done with fashion forever. at least that would be utilitarian
August 12th, 2010 at 9:01 am
first time commenter i think (maybe second) but longtime lurker… however this took me out of my lurking ways…. i feel offended by this romper.
Rompers are stupid, and obviously makes you feel creeped out. I wouldn’t pay for that shit, it’s $157.99 too expensive. I am more concerned on the customer on UO that thought the item was “reallycool”.
And here i thought levi’s couldn’t do no wrong…i was wrong
August 12th, 2010 at 9:17 am
Ugly AND impractical, hey sign me up! ;-p
August 12th, 2010 at 9:18 am
Everyone has made good points, and I especially agree with ElenaR. Why fake the funk, you know? But yeah, it’s an unflattering, lover repellent mess!
August 12th, 2010 at 9:35 am
Manrepeller 4 sure & an adult diaper required for a night on a bar crawl. Or else …
August 12th, 2010 at 9:36 am
i want to punch it in the throat.
August 12th, 2010 at 9:57 am
I’m just imagining all that fabric trailing on the floor of a public restroom when the person has to take a pee. Not to mention the fact that you have to wash the whole thing every time you wear it, whereas jeans only need to be washed maybe every 7 or 8 wears, if that.
August 12th, 2010 at 11:26 am
I think the real icing on the cake is styling this little Adventure in Fashion Catastrophes with black suede heels. The heels say, “This becomes a classy garment the instant we come into the picture! Never mind that it looks like a denim prison jumpsuit the rest of the time!”
…gosh, I bet my horse drool/shit/fly spray-covered ill-fitting barn jeans could become the height of ironic chic with heels like that.
August 12th, 2010 at 11:27 am
The ass of her jeans is saggy because the woman has no ass. Maybe the romper configuration was out of necessity, as the only feasible way to keep her pants from falling right off.
August 12th, 2010 at 11:28 am
…on the plus side, I bet a woman wearing this would be totally rape proof. It’ll scare off all but the dregs of the male population to begin with, and said dregs who aren’t totally repelled will be utterly unable to get the Jumpsuit of Doom off the victim, giving her time to punch them in the face with a Classy Suede Heel and run away.
August 12th, 2010 at 11:35 am
Ooooooooooooooooh, ManRepeller would LOVE this. LOL.
I second what Aja said. If you can’t even throw on jeans and a shirt separately…I mean…
*sigh*
August 12th, 2010 at 12:04 pm
lol @Greg
August 12th, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Its footie jammies without the feets. Miss J is always creeped out and confused when baby clothes are crossed with women’s clothes.
August 12th, 2010 at 1:22 pm
I’m creeped out because even if I DID wear it – HOW is Johnny Depp meant to do me in it?!
I actually can’t think of any benefits or reasons why this fake romper should exist. It’s just not meant to be. Its very existence unbalances the force.
August 12th, 2010 at 2:08 pm
Instant fashion at it’s best. How cunning, to pack a major trends in one overall.
It misses some studs to be really perfect.
August 12th, 2010 at 2:58 pm
You know what this immediately reminded me of…? Those saggy jeans with the boxers sewn into them from the late 90’s to take the guesswork out of “sagging”. Nice.
August 12th, 2010 at 4:02 pm
Whaaa..? The boxers sewn in them? I’d prefer not to know that such horrors existed!
August 12th, 2010 at 4:41 pm
no waist. baggy.
Not flattering on anyone-not even the emaciated “model”
August 12th, 2010 at 5:06 pm
(blankstare) hey watch it get ‘SOLD OUT’ soon. it is only 158.00 dollars after all. wait till one of the ‘reputable’ members of the ‘Fashion Followsheep’ gets her hand on one…and their minions “DIE’ and ‘GENIUS’ all over it. it will be EPIC !!
you know what? i actually went to the UO website to see if anyone had reviewed it yet, you know just for kicks, but alas the count is still zero…must say i am rather CRUSHED.
August 12th, 2010 at 5:13 pm
What the HELL is this?
What comes to my mind are those orange prison jumpsuits but now they’re fashion forward
August 12th, 2010 at 5:25 pm
well this is like baby clothes for women… too uncomfortable to think about.
August 12th, 2010 at 8:00 pm
im especially creeped out that they cost 185 bux
August 12th, 2010 at 8:30 pm
i was creeped out because it immediately made me think of Stringbean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_%22Stringbean%22_Akeman
August 12th, 2010 at 10:39 pm
Cricket- I was looking for a link to a picture of the saggy jeans w/attached boxer when I found something even better!!
http://www.metro.co.uk/lifestyle/615327-are-they-jeans-or-is-it-a-thong
HAHA!
August 12th, 2010 at 10:53 pm
SHoeGirl – OH GOD, HAHAHAHAHAHA!
August 12th, 2010 at 10:56 pm
damaia – Good point, very cogent, A++++++++!
August 12th, 2010 at 10:56 pm
I’m laughing so hard at these comments, my stomach hurts.
August 12th, 2010 at 11:20 pm
That’s good. We want your stomach to hurt.
Well, we want you to keep laughing.
Maybe it’s a different (ie better) hurt.
Love
August 13th, 2010 at 5:01 am
ShoeGirl, all I ever wanted is to wear jeans AND have my ass hanging out at the same time – and here they are! How “insanely stylish” it would be to wear them with a classy goat-hoof shoes by Al Wang! I’m dying, I’m dying!
August 13th, 2010 at 8:09 am
Those thong jeans are AMAZING! Thank you, ShoeGirl!
August 13th, 2010 at 3:36 pm
hahahahhhahahahahhahahahhahahhhHAHAHAHAHAAHHAhahahahahhah
why………..
seriously, are people that lazy that they can’t just, like, buy a shirt and buy a pair of jeans and wear them at the same time? they have to be sewn together?
August 13th, 2010 at 5:41 pm
it’s not true, is it?? that’s not really a ‘romper’… that’s just … that’s just… words escape me!
August 13th, 2010 at 8:05 pm
haha thong jeans! I wish I could see those in real life.
August 14th, 2010 at 1:35 am
I think I’d rather wear a fat suit.
August 14th, 2010 at 7:46 am
The only question that comes to mind is . . .
why?
It just serves no purpose, achieves nothing, isn’t useful or beautiful or quirky or interesting. It is just befuddling.
August 15th, 2010 at 8:48 pm
I just re-read Sketch42’s comment and laughed aloud. There is nothing worse than having to get naked to go to the bathroom. I had this thought today at ballet when I had to take everything off, just to take a wee. It is so wrong and weird.
August 16th, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Not creeped out, just saying “No, no no…”
August 18th, 2010 at 7:16 am
why would you want to have to take off your shirt to take a piss? Why?
August 20th, 2010 at 7:37 pm
ah! thank you for making me sob with laughter! what a perfectly hilarious abomination.
October 19th, 2010 at 12:31 am
Have a great day! Thanks for sharing. :0